I want to talk about the Covid “Vaccinations”. Or, as I prefer to call it, “Jabs”. Because the elixir being injected into people is not a vaccine- it offers no immunity, no impediment to transmission, and the narrative around it reducing severe illness is also crumbling.
When it comes to the Covid Jabs, the world seems to see people in one of two categories: Jabbed or Unjabbed. However, personally, I see three distinct categories.
1- the Willing and Grateful. (Or WaGs)
2- The Reluctant and Coerced. (RaCs)
3- The Courageous and Defiant. (CaDs)
1- The Willing and Grateful. (WaGs).
This group of people bought into the narrative very early in the Covid pandemic, and truly believed (I guess we all initially did) that a vaccine was the only way to reverse the freedoms and liberties that had been egregiously stripped from us in the way of lockdowns, impulsive draconian laws, brutal police enforcement, unfair travel restrictions, Orwellian speech and thought restrictions, wholesale small business closures, and the suspension of democracy.
This group of individuals were (and some continue to be) unmoved by the changes in facts around Covid. The promised return to normality once Covid Jab rates reached 70% never eventuated, even when Jabbed rates surpassed 80% and it was announced that, due to people still becoming ill and requiring hospitalisation, a second jab would be required.
The WaGs were happy to once again roll up their sleeves and receive a second "booster" jab. The WaGs watched in awe as second doses quickly climbed towards the magical 80%. When the goal posts were once again moved to 85%, then 90% boosted. Then, we were told, you weren’t “fully vaccinated” until you’ve had two jabs plus a third jab which is the actual booster. Some of the WaGs started to become confused and even angry. Understandable. But here's the thing.
The WaG people were not angry at the nation's leadership, state leaders, the health bureaucracy or the compliant media. They got angry at the 'Refusers', those that refused the Covid jab(s). I started to hear statements along the lines of "I hope that unvaccinated people are refused medical help", or, "I hope when a doctor has to choose between treating a vaccinated person or an unvaxxed, that the vaxxed person gets priority", and even a friend of mine on social media said something along the lines that Refusers should be stripped of Medicare benefits. Some of the WaGs were actually wishing the unjabbed to suffer.
The ever-so-faithful and dutiful WaG brigade, however, diligently lined up again once it was explained that a third jab, now called a booster, would be necessary to protect you and your loved ones from the deadly Covid virus.
Fast forward to late last year (2022), and the WaGs are still lining up for their fourth and fifth jab.
People are continuing to die from Covid19 complications despite two, three, four or five jabs. Sections of the WaG community are still angry at the Refusers. Some sections are blissfully unaware of the ride that they have been taken on, and still defend the harshest and most egregious policies. Look at the 2022 Victorian state election, for example. It seems true that it's easier to fool someone than it is to convince them that they've been fooled.
This cohort thought they were the defenders of the moral high ground, virtuously saving the world with a wave of the hand and blindly following the health bureaucracy dictates, looking down their noses at the unjabbed refusers, who for some unknown reason have had to justify their decision, when no other health decision has ever had to be justified to anyone in any circumstances, let alone total strangers. Unjabbed individuals have faced bitter and unjustified discrimination since the beginning of the vax rollout, and continue to do so. COVID: unvaccinated people may be seen as 'free riders' and face discrimination
But it isn't the WaGs’ fault. People have been fed the same narrative since day one of the Covid circus, so it's little wonder that they are so singularly focused and fixed to the dictates of the health bureaucracy and the compliant stenographers which are our media.
Unfortunately it seems very little of the WaGs are angry at the people they should direct their ire to. That is, the politicians and health bureaucrats that, despite demanding for three years that we "follow the science", did not look into the science themselves, (Health experts ignored FDA data and didn’t read the vaccine nonclinical report - Senator Gerard Rennick ) refuse to look at the data now, refused to change policy as information and data changed, and admit that the Covid response was totally incorrect in all areas of evaluation.
2-The Reluctant and Coerced. (RaCs)
This group of our society are the ones that accepted the jab despite not wanting to do so.
Under the threat of exclusion from family and greater society, inability to travel, and most egregiously, the inability to work and provide for themselves and their families, the RaCs voluntarily submitted and took at least two jabs.
The mental torment and anguish that the RaCs undoubtedly suffered would have varied from one individual to another, depending upon their own situations. Maybe for an individual who was going to get around to getting the jab, the mandate was the jolt they needed to get themselves motivated and jabbed. But for many I suspect that the pressure to conform to the mandates would have mounted and manifested as immense mental torture of unbearable weight.
I feel sorry for the RaCs. The decision to have an unproven medical procedure performed upon you as an alternative to losing your job is a decision that no person should have to make. Those that took the jab are now living with that decision and I have no doubt that many are living with deep regret. This is true human suffering that has been induced by leaderless, spineless, arrogant, ignorant and seemingly malevolent Government and bureaucracy.
The RaCs are also angry. Just who they are angry at is unclear. The Health bureaucracy that introduced and pushed the mandates? The governments, especially the so-called conservative representation, who refused to see, yet alone act upon, the human rights violations surrounding these mandates? Their employers, who could have ended the madness immediately by standing up as one and supporting their employee’s right to choose? Their workmates who, by and large, failed to support their colleagues' decisions? The compliant unions who sided with government and big business at the expense of their fee-paying membership? (Remember back when unions and the Labor party stood up for workers facing tyranny?) Their family and friends who pressured or shamed them into submitting? Or are they just angry with themselves?
I saw an article some time ago that described the RaCs as “Brave”. But I disagree. It is the next category of people who I regard as truly brave.
3--The Courageous and Defiant (CaDs)
The CaDs, for whatever reason, and at whatever stage of the pandemic, chose to hold their ground and refuse the Covid jab. Their personal reasons are not important. At all.
It could have been distrust in any government that chooses to suspend democracy and silence dissenting voices within parliament, the media, or the general public.
It could have been distrust in the government and the official narrative during and following bizarre policies surrounding lockdowns and restrictions.
It could have been distrust of an untried experimental invasive medical procedure.
It could have been because, even very early in the stages of the vaccine rollout, there was evidence that the injections were not vaccines at all in the true definition of the word. (Notice that the official definition of “vaccine” was changed during the rollout to remove reference to “immunity”). Vaccine definition was changed as COVID-19 virus shots weakened | Chris Powell | journalinquirer.com
It could have been that Australia’s response to covid was ridiculously unproportionable to the risk that the disease presented, when information and videos out of China showing people dropping dead in the streets were obviously fake, and video of frantic and overcrowded hospital wards in Italy were proven to be staged.
Whatever their reasons, the CaDs smelled a rat.
It could have been the suspicions raised when no medical treatment was recommended, at all, until you reached the stage of needing to attend an ICU. I can think of no other affliction where a visit to a hospital results in no treatment. This makes no sense.
It could have been the suspicions raised when previously proven safe and effective medications were banned for use in the treatment of Covid despite an almost zero chance of harmful side-effects. Illogical.
It could have been the distrust that the CaDs felt when they were unable to voice dissent on social media without being banned, or even arrested by Police.
It could have been when dissenting Doctors and Medical Scientists also faced social media bans, traditional media bans and big tech shadow-banning. (To this day, Australian health professionals are not allowed to speak out against Covid vaccines, even if they believe their patients are being harmed). Qld bill to silence doctors – Stephen Andrew
Or, it could have been a political statement. Something along the lines of this: Every person is born as a sentient being with unalienable rights. These rights are not granted by any person, group or government. Being a citizen of a free liberal democracy means that not only is your freedom not granted by government, but no one, including government, has the ability to remove the right of freedom and the liberty of an individual. The powerful and elite of our nation came close to making the jab compulsory, which is unthinkable in a liberal society, and I think that we would have come a lot closer to that if it wasn’t for the CaDs digging in their heels and refusing to comply.
The Courageous and Defiant are the ones who spoke out, despite the condemnation of their fellow Australians. They are the ones who refused to comply, despite social ostracisation from other people including workmates, friends and family. They are the ones that faced financial difficulties or even financial ruin while defending the rights of the rest of us. They are the ones who are still having problems finding employment as big business in particular continues to push the narrative and failed Covid policies. They are the ones who attended a protest or two, many of which for the first time in their lives. They are the ones who faced labels such as “Granny killer”, or “Conspiracy Theorist”, both of which have turned out to be manifestly untrue.
They didn’t just stand for their rights; they stood for yours, too. Canberra protests
The CaDs did not demand lockdowns or compulsory medical procedures. They did not demand people wear stupid and ineffective face masks which were no more than outward virtue signalling and flagging compliance. They did not condemn work mates, friends and family to unemployment and possible financial ruin.
So here we are in 2023. There have been articles published recently that suggest an amnesty for those that formulated, implemented and enforced everything that was wrong about the Covid response. They want forgiveness because they say they knew little about what was happening and that they never thought their actions would be counterproductive or have negative consequences.
Hmm. I don’t think so.
If they were unsure, why did they pretend to have all of the answers? Why did they militarily use force to make people subscribe to their narrative and submit to their doctrine? Why didn’t they listen to other people, such as scientific and medical professionals, who offered dissenting ideas and a counter narrative? Why weren’t those people willing to change their policies and objectives as new information and data came to light as the pandemic progressed? Why couldn’t they look at successful policies implemented elsewhere around the globe and make changes here in Australia?
If 2022 was the year that the general public began to learn and accept the truth , then 2023 should be the year of reckoning, with those people responsible being exposed, the truth determined and published, and then we can discover the real objectives behind their reckless and destructive decisions.
The actions and policies of our governments and health bureaucracy during Covid split the Australian population in two, and once they did that, they spent a lot of energy setting the majority against the minority. This action was embarrassingly adopted and supported by virtue-signalling shallow people who were fully subscribed to the popular narrative which was being so relentlessly propagandised by our impotent media. This is not acceptable in any society or group of people. The fact that this was perpetrated by so-called conservative governments is even more outrageous. Is it any wonder that our society is suffering?
So when the elites try to divide us again, and they will, think about what you will do.
Let’s say that an extended lockdown is imposed to help combat climate change. This hypothetical is not hyperbolic. This course of action has already been suggested by the World Economic Forum.
If lockdowns are imposed in the future, will you comply? Will you watch small businesses being destroyed again? Will you stand by while families are torn apart? Will you ignore another generation of children whose education will be compromised? Will you understand the fragility of your birthright liberty? Will you cheer for harsher restrictions? Will you applaud the victimisation and oppression of those who are defending your rights? Will you allow an invasive medical procedure to be imposed upon you? Will you stand by as the elite set one part of the population against the other? Or will you say NO to any further tyranny and defend your freedoms that have been stripped from so many others?
It could have been the suspicions raised when no medical treatment was recommended, at all, until you reached the stage of needing to attend an ICU. I can think of no other affliction where a visit to a hospital results in no treatment. This makes no sense.
It could have been the suspicions raised when previously proven safe and effective medications were banned for use in the treatment of Covid despite an almost zero chance of harmful side-effects. Illogical.
It could have been the distrust that the CaDs felt when they were unable to voice dissent on social media without being banned, or even arrested by Police.
It could have been when dissenting Doctors and Medical Scientists also faced social media bans, traditional media bans and big tech shadow-banning. (To this day, Australian health professionals are not allowed to speak out against Covid vaccines, even if they believe their patients are being harmed). Qld bill to silence doctors – Stephen Andrew
Or, it could have been a political statement. Something along the lines of this: Every person is born as a sentient being with unalienable rights. These rights are not granted by any person, group or government. Being a citizen of a free liberal democracy means that not only is your freedom not granted by government, but no one, including government, has the ability to remove the right of freedom and the liberty of an individual. The powerful and elite of our nation came close to making the jab compulsory, which is unthinkable in a liberal society, and I think that we would have come a lot closer to that if it wasn’t for the CaDs digging in their heels and refusing to comply.
The Courageous and Defiant are the ones who spoke out, despite the condemnation of their fellow Australians. They are the ones who refused to comply, despite social ostracisation from other people including workmates, friends and family. They are the ones that faced financial difficulties or even financial ruin while defending the rights of the rest of us. They are the ones who are still having problems finding employment as big business in particular continues to push the narrative and failed Covid policies. They are the ones who attended a protest or two, many of which for the first time in their lives. They are the ones who faced labels such as “Granny killer”, or “Conspiracy Theorist”, both of which have turned out to be manifestly untrue.
They didn’t just stand for their rights; they stood for yours, too. Canberra protests
The CaDs did not demand lockdowns or compulsory medical procedures. They did not demand people wear stupid and ineffective face masks which were no more than outward virtue signalling and flagging compliance. They did not condemn work mates, friends and family to unemployment and possible financial ruin.
So here we are in 2023. There have been articles published recently that suggest an amnesty for those that formulated, implemented and enforced everything that was wrong about the Covid response. They want forgiveness because they say they knew little about what was happening and that they never thought their actions would be counterproductive or have negative consequences.
Hmm. I don’t think so.
If they were unsure, why did they pretend to have all of the answers? Why did they militarily use force to make people subscribe to their narrative and submit to their doctrine? Why didn’t they listen to other people, such as scientific and medical professionals, who offered dissenting ideas and a counter narrative? Why weren’t those people willing to change their policies and objectives as new information and data came to light as the pandemic progressed? Why couldn’t they look at successful policies implemented elsewhere around the globe and make changes here in Australia?
If 2022 was the year that the general public began to learn and accept the truth , then 2023 should be the year of reckoning, with those people responsible being exposed, the truth determined and published, and then we can discover the real objectives behind their reckless and destructive decisions.
The actions and policies of our governments and health bureaucracy during Covid split the Australian population in two, and once they did that, they spent a lot of energy setting the majority against the minority. This action was embarrassingly adopted and supported by virtue-signalling shallow people who were fully subscribed to the popular narrative which was being so relentlessly propagandised by our impotent media. This is not acceptable in any society or group of people. The fact that this was perpetrated by so-called conservative governments is even more outrageous. Is it any wonder that our society is suffering?
So when the elites try to divide us again, and they will, think about what you will do.
Let’s say that an extended lockdown is imposed to help combat climate change. This hypothetical is not hyperbolic. This course of action has already been suggested by the World Economic Forum.
If lockdowns are imposed in the future, will you comply? Will you watch small businesses being destroyed again? Will you stand by while families are torn apart? Will you ignore another generation of children whose education will be compromised? Will you understand the fragility of your birthright liberty? Will you cheer for harsher restrictions? Will you applaud the victimisation and oppression of those who are defending your rights? Will you allow an invasive medical procedure to be imposed upon you? Will you stand by as the elite set one part of the population against the other? Or will you say NO to any further tyranny and defend your freedoms that have been stripped from so many others?
No comments:
Post a Comment